Show Me the Economist Who Says We Are In a Crisis Because of a Birth Control Shortage
In perhaps the most absurd move yet by the current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is defending her move to include hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money in the stimulus plan to expand family planning services — arguing that it will help financially strapped states.
“…this is a, to stimulate the economy, is an economic recovery package and as we put it forth we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy. Food stamps, unemployment insurance, some of the initiatives you just mentioned. Believe it or not, they’re the right thing to do but they also stimulate the economy,” Pelosi told George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week,” who unsurprisingly didn’t press her on how exactly she deduces this notion. Read the rest at Andrea Tantaros
less children as a result of contraception equals less takpayers paying social security taxes equals more seniors out of luck. Fortunately any children born now won't be old enough to pay taxes to help me out very much. Pat Robertson once used the opposite "logic" to promote having MORE children. At least his suggestion was a sequitor. Pelosi was just a non.
In perhaps the most absurd move yet by the current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is defending her move to include hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money in the stimulus plan to expand family planning services — arguing that it will help financially strapped states.







less children as a result of contraception equals less takpayers paying social security taxes equals more seniors out of luck. Fortunately any children born now won't be old enough to pay taxes to help me out very much. Pat Robertson once used the opposite "logic" to promote having MORE children. At least his suggestion was a sequitor. Pelosi was just a non.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like